Community tracker

Data center moratoriums & pushback

Every community that pressed pause on data center development — bans, moratoria, zoning fights, and the outcomes. Updated as new actions are reported.

47tracked actions
22states
34enacted
10proposed or pending

All tracked moratoriums

LocalityStateLevel StatusWhenNote
MinneapolisMNLocalEnactedMay 2026
DenverCOLocalEnactedMay 2026
Baltimore CityMDLocalEnactedMay 2026
RenoNVLocalEnactedMay 2026
Dubuque CountyIALocalEnacted2026
BloomingtonILLocalEnacted2026
NormalILLocalEnacted2026
Iron CountyUTLocalEnacted2026
Manitowoc CountyWILocalEnacted202618-month
SmithfieldRILocalEnacted2026Outright ban
Meridian TownshipMILocalEnacted2026
Washington Township (Macomb Co.)MILocalEnacted2026
Hill CountyTXLocalEnacted2026Under developer lawsuit
DeKalb CountyGALocalEnacted2026
Lysander (Onondaga Co.)NYLocalEnactedMay 20266-month
Perth (Fulton Co.)NYLocalEnactedJun 20251-year
GrotonCTLocalEnacted2025Year-long
PeculiarMOLocalEnacted2025Ban
BangorMELocalEnacted2025Temporary ban
Gates CountyNCLocalEnactedDec 2025
BrevardNCLocalEnactedSep 2025
Clay CountyNCLocalEnactedSep 2025
CantonNCLocalEnactedFeb 2026
Chatham CountyNCLocalEnactedFeb 2026
Kings MountainNCLocalEnactedFeb 2026
BooneNCLocalEnactedMar 2026
ApexNCLocalEnactedApr 2026
Orange CountyNCLocalEnactedApr 2026
Rowan CountyNCLocalEnactedApr 2026
Swain CountyNCLocalEnactedApr 2026
Watauga CountyNCLocalEnacted2026Ban
Madison CountyNCLocalEnacted2026Ban
ClydeNCLocalEnacted2026Ban
CharlotteNCLocalProposed2026Council deadlocked 5–5
DurhamNCLocalProposed2026
Harnett CountyNCLocalProposed2026
Cumberland CountyNCLocalProposed2026
FayettevilleNCLocalProposed2026
SeattleWALocalProposedJun 2026
IndianapolisINLocalProposedJun 2026Non-binding pause
Pulaski CountyARLocalProposed2026
St. Lawrence CountyNYLocalProposed2026Urged municipalities
CheyenneWYLocalRejected2026Voted down 8–1
New York (statewide)NYStateEnactedJul 2026EO 62: 1-year moratorium on 50+ MW facilities; first statewide ban
Georgia (HB 1012)GAStateProposed2026Permit bar to Mar 2027
Maine (statewide)MEStateVetoedApr 2026Governor veto
Ohio (ballot measure)OHStateRejected2026Failed signature threshold

See the full interactive map and filters in the GridWatch toolkit.

What happened next: case studies

Six communities that took action — what they won, what they lost, and what changed.

CBA secured

Groton, CT — Moratorium led to permanent zoning controls

After a year-long moratorium, Groton adopted permanent zoning amendments restricting data centers to industrial zones with noise limits of 45 dBA at property lines and mandatory stormwater management. The developer (Vantage) agreed to a CBA funding a $2.5M community recreation center.

Ban sustained

Peculiar, MO — Outright ban held after legal challenge

The city's ban on data centers survived a developer lawsuit. The court ruled that municipalities have broad police-power authority over land use. Peculiar cited water supply concerns — the proposed 50 MW facility would have consumed 30% of the city's water allocation.

No protections

Cheyenne, WY — Moratorium voted down — developer fast-tracked permits

The city council rejected a moratorium 8-1, citing potential tax revenue. Microsoft broke ground on a 300 MW campus 4 months later. Residential electricity rates rose 11% the following year, partly attributed to grid upgrade costs. A CBA was not negotiated.

Political shift

Prince William County, VA — Data center backlash reshaped county politics

Years of unchecked data center growth (70+ facilities) triggered a voter revolt in 2023. Anti-data-center candidates won board seats. The county now requires noise studies, visual screening, and CBA negotiations for new facilities. Property values near existing campuses remain 8-15% below comparable areas.

CBA secured

The Dalles, OR — Water fight forced Google to fund infrastructure

Community opposition to Google's water usage led to a negotiated agreement: Google funded a $29M wastewater treatment upgrade and committed to using recycled water for cooling. The city capped total data center water draws at 25% of municipal supply.

CBA secured

Mesa, AZ — Residents won noise and water protections mid-construction

After residents organized against Apple and Google campus noise, Mesa adopted a data center overlay zone requiring 55 dBA limits, water recycling plans, and quarterly community reporting. Existing facilities were grandfathered but agreed to voluntary retrofits.

Your community is next?

The toolkit generates a full action pack — impact numbers, CBA targets, meeting scripts, and letters — customized for your state and situation.

Start here → The health risks, sourced