The data center fight in Jersey City, New Jersey
Jersey City has a proposed data center moratorium on this tracker. Status is derived, not stored — a pause with a documented end date flips to Expired on its own — and the source is right next to the claim.
Status today
Ordinance 26-057 would bar data centers as the principal use of industrial land. Passed first reading and the planning board; final council vote set for Aug 19, 2026
Source
read 2026-08-04
An expiry date is the earliest a pause could have ended — extensions are common, so confirm with the clerk before citing it.
Recent news
- Jersey City wants to ban data centers on industrial property
- Jersey City Bans Development of New Standalone Data Centers
- Big Tech wants more data centers. Residents in this New Jersey city said not here.
Automated news aggregation, not human-verified — follow each link to the original outlet. Part of the story tracker, 3 headlines archived.
What to do next
- Questions to ask at the hearing — force specific answers onto the record.
- Estimate the impact — electricity, water, and rate pressure for any facility size in New Jersey.
- Model CBA clauses — copy-paste language communities have actually won.
- New Jersey briefing — rates, grid carbon, PUC contacts, and every fight in the state.
Elsewhere in New Jersey
- Monroe Township (Gloucester Co.) — Enacted
- Phillipsburg — Enacted
- Warren — Enacted
- Howell Township — Proposed
- Andover Township — Proposed
- Summit — Enacted
- Cherry Hill — Enacted
- Medford — Enacted
- Mansfield Township (Burlington Co.) — Enacted
- Chesterfield — Enacted
- Berkeley Heights — Enacted
- East Brunswick — Proposed
- Waterford Township (Camden Co.) — Enacted
- Plainfield — Proposed
- North Plainfield — Proposed
- Red Bank — Enacted
- Asbury Park — Enacted
As of August 2026 · changes weekly — re-check before citing
Illustrative rather than exhaustive — dozens of localities churn weekly, and this tracks the ones we have read a source for. **Each row carries its own provenance.** Rows showing a verification date link to the ordinance, the enacting body's own page, or a datable report of the vote, and were read on that date. Rows marked *unverified* came from bulk compilation and have not been checked against a primary source — the locality, the year, and the status may all be off. Verify one of those with the town clerk before citing it as precedent. **Expiry is derived, not asserted.** A row with a documented end date flips to *Expired* on its own once that date passes. A time-limited moratorium whose start date was never documented keeps showing as enacted — that is a known gap, not a claim that it is still in force. Moratoriums are also routinely extended, so an expiry date is the earliest it could have ended, not proof that it did.
Part of the U.S. data center moratorium tracker — open data, CC BY 4.0.