Michigan: data centers & your electric bill
As of October 1, 2026, AI GridWatch tracks 64 data center moratoriums or pushback actions in Michigan: 44 in force, 3 proposed, 17 expired, rejected or rescinded. The state has 62 tracked data center facilities using an estimated 1.1 TWh of electricity a year.
Everything GridWatch tracks in Michigan on one page — proposed projects, moratoriums, permits, officials, and the 2026 ballot.
Subscribe by RSS — moratorium changes and community headlines for Michigan.
As of July 2026 (3m ago) · changes over months · Source: U.S. Data Center Power Map by State — ElectricChoice.com compilation (updated July 2026; CC-BY 4.0). Underlying load research: LBNL 2024 US Data Center Energy Usage Report; rates: EIA
Facility counts vary by directory because each one draws the boundary differently — DataCenterMap lists 44 in Alabama where this table says 35, since it counts small network rooms alongside hyperscale campuses. Cite the TWh figure rather than the facility count when you can; it is the number that speaks to grid impact. Underlying load research is LBNL-2001637 (Dec 2024).
1Proposed data centers in Michigan (4)
1 still live · 3 decided or withdrawn. Each name links to the full dossier — ownership, intelligence log, and where to read the paper trail.
| Project | Where | Size | Behind it | Stage | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Flex | Lyon Township (Oakland County) | — | Verrus | Awaiting decision | Source read 2026-08-14 |
| OpenAI Stargate Michigan | Saline | — | Oracle | Under construction | Source read 2026-08-14 |
| Augusta Township data center (Thor Equities) | Augusta Township (Washtenaw County) | 500 ac | Thor Equities | Denied | Source read 2026-08-08 |
| Deep Green downtown data center | Lansing (Ingham County) | 24 MW | Deep Green (UK) | Withdrawn | Source read 2026-08-07 |
2Pushback already happening in Michigan
| Where | Level | Status | Note | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meridian Township | Local | Enactedexpires soon — 2026-11-19 | 6-month pause on data centers and battery storage facilities; preemptive — no proposals pending | SourceNews read 2026-08-13 |
| Washington Township (Macomb Co.) | Local | Enactedexpires soon — 2026-11-23 | 6-month pause or until zoning ordinance amendments take effect; passed after Prologis withdrew a 312-acre 'technical campus' application | SourceNews read 2026-08-13 |
| Rochester Hills | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-03-15 | 180-day moratorium adopted Mar 2026, extended through mid-Mar 2027; studying noise, vibration, light pollution, water, electricity demand | SourceNews read 2026-08-13 |
| Flint | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-06-08 | 12-month moratorium, 7-1; no permits, site plans, or construction for data centers accepted or processed during the pause | SourceNews read 2026-08-13 |
| Ypsilanti (YCUA) | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-04-22 | Utility-level: 12-month moratorium on water and sewer service to new data centers, unanimous. Blocks a \$1.25B U-M / Los Alamos computing facility; U-M has threatened to sue | SourceNews read 2026-08-13 |
| Wixom | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-08-26 | 6-month moratorium on data center permits, construction, and installation. Superseded Aug 26 by permanent zoning amendments restricting DCs to heavy-industrial districts with setback, noise, and water-use limits. Sansone Group federal suit still pending. | SourceNews read 2026-09-11 |
| Saline | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-01-12 | 12-month citywide moratorium on new data center approvals, unanimous | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Grand Blanc Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-01-21 | 1-year moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Manchester Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-10-14 | 2-year moratorium — longest duration among Michigan communities | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Armada Township | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-07-13 | 180-day moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Green Charter Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2026-12-09 | 1-year moratorium citing water, energy, and noise concerns | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Pittsfield Township | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-05-17 | 180-day moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Howell Township | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-05-20 | 6-month moratorium on data center development | SourceNews read 2026-08-13 |
| Northville | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-01-06 | 12-month moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Pontiac | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-07-21 | 6-month moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Saginaw | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-07-13 | 6-month moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Sterling Heights | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-02-04 | 1-year moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| South Lyon | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-02-10 | 12-month moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Taylor | Local | Enactedfixed term, end date not recorded | 1-year moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Tyrone Township | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-06-01 | 6-month moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Dundee Township | Local | Enactedfixed term, end date not recorded | 90-day moratorium with extension on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Sylvan Township | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-07-22 | 6-month moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Lodi Township | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-08-02 | 180-day moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| York Township | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-08-12 | 6-month moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Hayes Township | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-08-09 | 180-day moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Springfield Township | Local | Enactedfixed term, end date not recorded | 180-day moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Village of Romeo | Local | Enactedterm not documented | Moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Solon Township | Local | Enactedfixed term, end date not recorded | 6-month moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Big Rapids Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-02-23 | 1-year moratorium on data center development | SourceRoundup read 2026-08-13 |
| Lenox Township | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-06-02 | 4-month moratorium effective Feb 2, 2026 with one 4-month extension option; the township's adoption statement has since been removed from its site. The Jun 1, 2026 board agenda carried no extension item, so whether the option was exercised is unrecorded | SourceRoundup read 2026-09-04 |
| East Lansing | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-03-17 | 6-month extension, unanimous, running to Mar 17, 2027. Extends the moratorium adopted Mar 2026, which would have lapsed Sep 2026. Preemptive — no data center has been proposed in the city; the city's zoning ordinance does not address data centers at all and staff expect to bring draft language in Sep/Oct 2026 | SourceNews read 2026-08-23 |
| Garfield Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-08-25 | 1-year moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining facilities, unanimous, to allow a zoning-ordinance update; township policy allows a further 6-month extension if the update isn't finished, which is not yet in effect | SourceNews read 2026-09-02 |
| Delta County | County | Enactedexpires 2027-07-23 | 12-month moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining; county board approved unanimously after planning commission forwarded recommendation; county to develop zoning standards during pause | SourceNews read 2026-09-06 |
| Forsyth Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-06-25 | 12-month moratorium on data center construction; board passed at crowded meeting; township lacks data center zoning regulations and has no pending applications | SourceNews read 2026-09-06 |
| Houghton | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-07-09 | One-year moratorium on permitting, approval, or installation of data center facilities; city council voted unanimously; no proposals pending but city acted proactively to develop regulations | SourceNews read 2026-09-06 |
| Huron County | County | Enactedexpires 2029-05-27 | Three-year (36-month) moratorium on data centers; planning commission unanimously extended original 6-month proposal to 36 months at April 1 hearing after public demand; county commissioners approved in May; concerns center on farmland preservation and resource use | SourceNews read 2026-09-06 |
| Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians | Local | Enactedno end date — permanent | Indefinite moratorium prohibiting development, approval, or operation of AI data centers on tribal lands; board of directors voted unanimously; remains in effect unless lifted by subsequent resolution; concerns about resource strain and long-term land use impacts | SourceNews read 2026-09-06 |
| Saugatuck Township | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-08-11 | Ordinance 2026-01: 6-month moratorium on data center building permits and zoning applications, or until zoning amendment adopted. Voted 4-0 (one absent) | SourceOfficial read 2026-09-06 |
| Hagar Township | Local | Enactedfixed term, end date not recorded | Moratorium on data centers approved at board meeting; Berrien County. Source is paywalled but headline and snippets confirm | SourceNews read 2026-09-06 |
| Lake Township | Local | Enactedfixed term, end date not recorded | Ordinance 2026-01: temporary moratorium on new or expanded data centers. Voted 4-0 (clerk absent). Huron County township; separate from county-level 3-year moratorium | SourceNews read 2026-09-06 |
| Webster Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-04-21 | Ordinance 26-02: 1-year moratorium on data centers and battery energy storage systems (BESS). Washtenaw County township | SourceNews read 2026-09-06 |
| Allen Park | Local | Proposedterm not documented | Planning commission rejected 26MW data center; city council considering 6-month moratorium on data center developments as of June 2026. No confirmed vote on moratorium yet. | SourceNews read 2026-09-06 |
| Genoa Township | Local | Enactedterm not documented | Board of Trustees approved a one-time 6-month extension of the moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining facilities. Additional time needed for noise restriction provisions. This is Genoa Township in Livingston County, MI — not Ohio. | SourceNews read 2026-09-06 |
| Lansing | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-01-25 | Lansing City Council passed 182-day moratorium on Jul 14, 2026 (7-1 vote). Takes effect Jul 27, lasts until Jan 25, 2027. Pauses new building permits and zoning applications for data centers. Follows withdrawal of Deep Green AI proposal for downtown data center. | SourceNews read 2026-09-06 |
| Michigan (HB 5594-5596) | State | Proposedterm not documented | HB 5594-5596 (House) and companion SB 1018-1020 (Senate) introduced June 2026. Data Center Regulation Act would halt new data center permits until Apr 1, 2027. Bipartisan sponsors (Reps. Wortz R, Fox R, Wegela D). In House Committee on Government Operations. Governor Whitmer has explicitly stated she would veto any moratorium legislation. | SourceNews read 2026-09-06 |
| Zeeland Township | Local | Enactedterm not documented | Township Board unanimously approved new 1-year moratorium on data centers and energy facilities, replacing a previous moratorium that was repealed at the same meeting. Provides time to review and update master plan. | SourceNews read 2026-09-06 |
| Allendale Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-06-08 | Ordinance 2026-07, one-year moratorium on data centers, battery storage, large-scale solar, and wind farms. Township board voted to study and implement ordinance revisions. | SourceNews read 2026-09-07 |
| Big Rapids Charter Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-02-23 | One-year moratorium on permitting, consideration, approval, location, construction, and installation of data center facilities. | SourceOfficial read 2026-09-07 |
| Caledonia Township | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-07-01 | Six-month moratorium on data center and data mining operations, backdated to Jan 1 2026. Prompted by developer inquiries about property at 68th Street and Kraft Avenue. | SourceNews read 2026-09-07 |
| Detroit | Local | Proposedterm not documented | City Council voted 6-2 for a resolution asking Mayor Sheffield to impose a two-year moratorium on data center permits. The mayor has not adopted it, instead convening a stakeholder working group with a Dec 31, 2026 deadline for policy recommendations. | SourceNews read 2026-09-07 |
| Fenton Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-02-17 | Ordinance No. 867, twelve-month moratorium to allow the Township Board and Planning Commission to evaluate and prepare permanent zoning regulations for data centers. | SourceNews read 2026-09-07 |
| Filer Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-06-02 | One-year moratorium on data center development. Public comment raised concerns about water usage, energy requirements, noise, and demolition plans. | SourceRoundup read 2026-09-07 |
| Haring Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-01-14 | Six-month moratorium on construction of data centers, approved unanimously. Planning commission directed to develop permanent regulatory standards. Key concerns: water usage, noise pollution, privacy, property tax impacts. | SourceNews read 2026-09-07 |
| Hart | Local | Enactedexpires soon — 2026-11-26 | City Council unanimously adopted six-month moratorium on data centers and digital mining uses. Described as proactive rather than a response to a specific proposal. | SourceRoundup read 2026-09-07 |
| Lincoln Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-04-11 | 10-month moratorium on data center development. Allows planning commission time to study noise, water and electrical consumption, and community impacts. | SourceNews read 2026-09-07 |
| Lowell Township | Local | Rejectedterm not documented | Township Board voted 2-5 against a proposed six-month moratorium. Proposed in response to Microsoft's plans for a data center at the 237-acre Covenant Business Park. Rejection prompted recall petitions for three board members. | SourceNews read 2026-09-07 |
| Lyndon Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-05-22 | Resolution 26-06, 12-month moratorium on issuance of permits, licenses, or approvals for data centers, or until permanent regulations adopted. | SourceNews read 2026-09-07 |
| Lyon Charter Township | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-08-30 | 180-day moratorium on data centers and all proposed developments over 100,000 sq ft, unanimous. Prompted by backlash over 'Project Flex' — a 1.8M-sq-ft Verrus data center on 172 acres approved by planning commission in Sep 2025. The already-approved project is not affected. | SourceNews read 2026-09-07 |
| Mason | Local | Expiredterm ran to 2026-02-03 | Ordinance 267, 90-day moratorium on data center permits. Lifted Feb 3 when council adopted M-3 Technology Innovation District zoning (Ordinance 266, 5-2). Ord 266 then repealed 4-2 on Mar 16 after a 755-signature citizen referendum petition. Council adopted a citizen-initiated noise and vibration ordinance in June. | SourceNews read 2026-09-07 |
| Parma Township | Local | Enactedterm not documented | Ordinance 2026-3, data center moratorium. Jackson County township. | SourceOfficial read 2026-09-07 |
| Porter Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-05-19 | 12-month moratorium on data center development, unanimous vote. Enacted to establish data center guidelines before developers arrive. Multiple Cass County townships have enacted similar moratoriums. | SourceNews read 2026-09-07 |
| Texas Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2027-07-05 | Resolution 26-12, 12-month moratorium on data center developments including AI and cryptocurrency mining facilities. Planning commission to evaluate impacts on farmland preservation, infrastructure capacity, and environmental factors. | SourceNews read 2026-09-07 |
| Waterford Township | Local | Enactedexpires soon — 2026-10-01 | Ordinance No. 2026-Z-003, six-month moratorium on rezoning, site plan approval, special land use approval, building permits, and business registrations for new data center facilities, running until Oct 1, 2026. A six-month extension (Ordinance 2026-Z-012) was introduced unanimously Sep 14 and listed for adoption Sep 28, 2026; adoption not yet confirmed. | SourceOfficial read 2026-09-29 |
| Orion Township | Local | Enactedexpires 2026-12-17 | Board passed a six-month moratorium 7-0 at the request of the planning commission and planning/zoning department, which said the current zoning ordinance does not address modern data centers. Resolution covers facilities housing computer systems, servers, telecommunications equipment and data storage. Supervisor cited water and power usage; township may extend it. | SourceNews read 2026-09-07 |
As of August 2026 (2m ago) · changes weekly — re-check before citing
Illustrative rather than exhaustive — dozens of localities churn weekly, and this tracks the ones we have read a source for. **Each row carries its own provenance.** Rows showing a verification date link to the ordinance, the enacting body's own page, or a datable report of the vote, and were read on that date. Rows marked *unverified* came from bulk compilation and have not been checked against a primary source — the locality, the year, and the status may all be off. Verify one of those with the town clerk before citing it as precedent. **Expiry is derived, not asserted.** A row with a documented end date flips to *Expired* on its own once that date passes. A time-limited moratorium whose start date was never documented keeps showing as enacted — that is a known gap, not a claim that it is still in force. Moratoriums are also routinely extended, so an expiry date is the earliest it could have ended, not proof that it did.
3Other Michigan communities in the news (1)
Places with archived data-center coverage but no moratorium on file. Grouped automatically from headlines and not verified — a lead worth reading, not a claim to cite.
- Dowagiac — 19 archived headlines
4Known data center campuses in Michigan
| Operator | Location | Tenant | Filing LLC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Southeast Michigan | Microsoft | Project-name / generic 'Holdings LLC'; less consistently codenamed |
⏳ No verification date recorded · changes over months · Source: Operator ownership & filing-LLC naming patterns — compiled from operator releases and county filings, then checked against SEC EDGAR full-text search. Composite, not a single citation: look the entity up yourself before naming it in a filing
Each row carries its own attribution level — first-party rows come from the operator's own site, but colocation and REIT ownership was compiled from trade press and never passed an independent fact-check. Check the attribution column before citing a row.
5Every data center already built in Michigan
The campuses above are the ones GridWatch tracks by operator and filing LLC. For the full inventory — street addresses of every existing facility, including the smaller colocation and network sites — DataCenterMap keeps a public directory for Michigan.
Browse the Michigan directory →
Two caveats before you cite it at a hearing: it lists facilities that already exist, so a newly proposed campus will not appear; and it counts a small network room the same as a hyperscale campus, so the facility count is not a measure of power draw or community impact.
6What Michigan's own study found
Data Centers in Michigan: Evaluation of Policy Controversies Regarding Hyperscale Data Center Development (June 2026)
Citizens Research Council of Michigan (Report 426)
Evaluation of tax policies, local grid capacity, water usage, and localized noise impacts.
- Modest Economic Multiplier: High temporary construction impact (1,000+ workers), but low permanent operational jobs (a few dozen per campus). Host communities benefit most from local property taxes and Community Benefit Agreements.
- Grid Capacity & Rates: Michigan's grid can accommodate load under current policies, but rapid load growth risks shifting infrastructure costs onto residential ratepayers. The Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) now requires utilities to prove large load additions will not raise rates for other customers.
- Clean Energy Goals: The 2023 Clean Energy Law requires 100% clean targets. Heavy data center draw risks forcing fossil-fuel runtimes if generation buildout lag behind. Most developers in MI are now investing directly in storage/renewables to mitigate this.
- Water Resources: Unlikely to threaten overall water resources due to closed-loop or evaporative cooling designs, but localized groundwater draw should be monitored.
- Noise Pollution: Identified as the most concerning localized community impact; requires strict zoning and noise mitigation from local permitting agencies.
Read the report · read 2026-08-13
7Your regulator
Michigan Public Service Commission — website · file a complaint
Official state energy data: EIA Michigan electricity profile — generation, prices, and consumption from the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
8Where the Michigan paper trail lives
Air & environmental permits: Michigan EGLE — Air Quality Division
Searchable register: MiEnviro Portal — a public database you can search by facility or permit number.
Grid interconnection queue: MISO (Midwest & Gulf) · PJM Interconnection (Mid-Atlantic, Ohio Valley)
A routing hint only — several states are split between markets, and the serving utility is the only authority on which queue a given site is in.
These are places to look, not evidence that anything has been filed. Links were checked on 2026-08-21; search links are queries, not records.
9Dowagiac — City Council
Meets: See the council's published agendas & minutes page. · Dowagiac City Hall, 241 S. Front Street, Dowagiac, MI 49047
Public comment: See the council's published agenda for a specific meeting's public-comment process.
Source: https://www.cityofdowagiac.com/ · as of 2026-08-12
10Allen Park — City Council
Meets: 2nd and 4th Tuesday, 6:00 p.m. · Allen Park City Hall, 15915 Southfield Rd, Allen Park, MI 48101
Public comment: See the city's published agendas for the public-comment process for a specific meeting.
Source: https://cityofallenpark.org/government/agenda_and_minutes/al · as of 2026-08-12
11Garfield Township — Township Board (Grand Traverse County)
Meets: See the township's published meetings page. · Garfield Township, Grand Traverse County, MI
Public comment: See the township's published agendas for the public-comment process for a specific meeting.
Source: https://www.traverseticker.com/news/garfield-township-tees-u · as of 2026-08-12
12Saline Township — Township Board
Meets: 2nd Wednesday of the month, 7:00 p.m. · Saline Township Hall, 5731 Braun Rd, Saline, MI 48176
Public comment: Contact the Clerk to be added to the agenda. Planning Commission meets 1st Tuesday at 7:00 p.m.
Source: https://salinetownship.org/board.html · as of 2026-08-12
13Lyon Township — Board of Trustees / Planning Commission
Meets: Board of Trustees: varies; Planning Commission: 2nd Monday, 6:00 p.m. · Lyon Township Hall, 58000 Grand River Ave, New Hudson, MI 48165
Public comment: Public comment at regular meetings; contact Township Clerk for sign-up procedures.
Source: https://www.lyontwp.org/government/township_boards_and_commi · as of 2026-08-18
14Your federal delegation and governor
Grades cross party — this is an issue axis, not a partisan one. A blank grade means no documented action was located, never that the official is neutral.
| Grade | Official | Documented action (sourced) | Reach them |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | Gretchen Whitmer Democratic · Governor | Proposed that data centers pledge to cover utility costs, protect the environment, and provide good-paying jobs. — Gov. Whitmer — data centers must pledge to cover utility costs (2026) | site · contact |
| — | Elissa Slotkin Democratic · Senator · next on the ballot 2030 | No documented action on data centers located | site · contact |
| — | Gary C. Peters Democratic · Senator · on the 2026 ballot | No documented action on data centers located | site · contact |
| — | Jack Bergman Republican · Representative 1 | No documented action on data centers located | site · contact |
| — | John James Republican · Representative 10 | No documented action on data centers located | site · contact |
| — | Haley M. Stevens Democratic · Representative 11 | No documented action on data centers located | site · contact |
| — | Rashida Tlaib Democratic · Representative 12 | No documented action on data centers located | site · contact |
| — | Shri Thanedar Democratic · Representative 13 | No documented action on data centers located | site · contact |
| — | John R. Moolenaar Republican · Representative 2 | No documented action on data centers located | site · contact |
| — | Hillary J. Scholten Democratic · Representative 3 | No documented action on data centers located | site · contact |
| — | Bill Huizenga Republican · Representative 4 | No documented action on data centers located | site · contact |
| — | Tim Walberg Republican · Representative 5 | No documented action on data centers located | site · contact |
| — | Debbie Dingell Democratic · Representative 6 | No documented action on data centers located | site · contact |
| — | Tom Barrett Republican · Representative 7 | No documented action on data centers located | site · contact |
| — | Kristen McDonald Rivet Democratic · Representative 8 | No documented action on data centers located | site · contact |
| — | Lisa C. McClain Republican · Representative 9 | No documented action on data centers located | site · contact |
Roster: regenerated by scripts/refresh_officials.py (Senate XML + congress-legislators + current governors).
Write to your senators → Your senators in detail → Full officials scorecard → Find your state legislators →
152026 U.S. Senate race
PVI EVEN · Seat held by Gary Peters (Democratic) · Incumbent retiring
Abdul El-Sayed (Democratic) Guardrails
Published “terms of engagement” for data centers: zero rate hikes, closed-loop cooling, no weakening of the state's clean-energy law, and penalties for noncompliance.
- Released a framework requiring developers to guarantee no utility rate increases, protect water and grid reliability, bar utilities from citing data-center demand to weaken Michigan clean-energy law, and attach clear penalties to every commitment. (2026-01 — source)
Record read 2026-08-25.
Mike Rogers (Republican) Mixed
Backed state and local control, then endorsed a one-year statewide moratorium days after his AI-sector investments were reported.
- Endorsed a one-year Michigan moratorium on new data-center development, citing community control, utility price hikes, water, and “pay-to-play schemes” — a state pause, not a national ban. (2026-08-20 — source)
- Shift came days after reporting that he holds millions in tech investments that stand to benefit from the data-center buildout; his campaign would not say whether he would divest. (2026-08-20 — source)
Record read 2026-08-25.
Recent mentions (3) — automated, not verified
Headlines that name this candidate and mention data centers or AI. Matched by a script, read by nobody. A mention is a lead, not a record — do not cite one as a position.
Douglas P. Marsh (Green) No record found
No documented statement or action on data centers located. Not scored — see how this page treats silence.
Lydia Christensen (Libertarian) No record found
No documented statement or action on data centers located. Not scored — see how this page treats silence.
Tim Long (U.S. Taxpayers) No record found
No documented statement or action on data centers located. Not scored — see how this page treats silence.
Ballot roster: state candidate list (read 2026-08-25).
162026 U.S. House races in Michigan (13)
A documented data-center record exists in 10 of 13 districts. A candidate with no badge colour has said nothing we could locate — that is a gap in the record, not a neutral position. ★ marks an incumbent.
| District | PVI | Incumbent | Candidates |
|---|---|---|---|
| MI-1 | R+11 | Jack Bergman | Jack Bergman ★ Callie Barr Arnett Satterla Doc Kovaly LaVeta Davenport Liz Hakola Zebulon Featherly |
| MI-2 | R+15 | John Moolenaar | John Moolenaar ★ Ben Ambrose Charlotte Magoon |
| MI-3 | D+4 | Hillary Scholten | Hillary Scholten ★ Terri DeBoer Joe Jock |
| MI-4 | R+3 | Bill Huizenga | Bill Huizenga ★ Sean McCann Shafina Che Barnett |
| MI-5 | R+13 | Tim Walberg | Tim Walberg ★ Christian Vukasovich Jim Bronke Ronald A Muszynski Sharon Marie Renier |
| MI-6 | D+12 | Debbie Dingell | Debbie Dingell ★ Heather Smiley Clyde Shabazz Linda Rayburn Michael Mickevicius Timothy A. Tegan |
| MI-7 | EVEN | Tom Barrett | Tom Barrett ★ William Lawrence Felix Thibodeau Shane Dedrick |
| MI-8 | R+1 | Kristen McDonald Rivet | Kristen McDonald Rivet ★ Thomas Smith Jim Casha Kathy Goodwin Mia C. Pettus |
| MI-9 | R+16 | Lisa McClain | Lisa McClain ★ Ray Pooley Destiny Clayton Jim Walkowicz John Vlahos Kevin Vayko |
| MI-10 | R+3 | John James | Christina Hines Mike Bouchard Andrea L. Kirby Kwabena Nkromo Mike Saliba |
| MI-11 | D+9 | Haley Stevens | Ethan Baker Jeremy Moss Anil Kumar Farid Ishac Ryan Teasdale |
| MI-12 | D+21 | Rashida Tlaib | Rashida Tlaib ★ James Hooper Brenda K. Sanders Gary Walkowicz Marc Joseph Sosnowski |
| MI-13 | D+22 | Shri Thanedar | Donavan McKinney T.P. Nykoriak Chris Dardzinski Maurice Morton Shelby Campbell Simone R. Coleman |
The documented records (10 districts)
MI-1
Jack Bergman (Republican) · incumbent Consensus vote only
On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.
- Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)
Record read 2026-09-22.
MI-2
John Moolenaar (Republican) · incumbent Consensus vote only
On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.
- Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)
Record read 2026-09-22.
MI-3
Hillary Scholten (Democratic) · incumbent Guardrails
Introduced two data center accountability bills: a resource disclosure act requiring annual energy and water surveys, and a DoD data center efficiency bill.
- Introduced H.R. 10005, the Data Center Resource Disclosure Act, requiring NTIA to conduct annual surveys of data center energy and water consumption and publish results on a public dashboard. (2026-07-30 — source)
- Introduced H.R. 10004, the Defending Our Energy and Water Act, directing DoD to update data center efficiency standards and mandate cooling technologies that reduce water impact. (2026-07-30 — source)
- Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)
Record read 2026-09-07.
MI-4
Bill Huizenga (Republican) · incumbent Consensus vote only
On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.
- Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)
Record read 2026-09-22.
MI-5
Tim Walberg (Republican) · incumbent Consensus vote only
On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.
- Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)
Record read 2026-09-22.
MI-6
Debbie Dingell (Democratic) · incumbent Guardrails
Co-signed the first congressional letter specifically investigating data center energy cost pass-throughs to ratepayers.
- One of 20 House members who signed a letter to FERC, Edison Electric Institute, and the Data Center Coalition expressing concern that data center energy costs are increasingly being passed onto everyday Americans and requesting information on consumer protections. (2025-10-28 — source)
- Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)
Record read 2026-09-07.
MI-7
Tom Barrett (Republican) · incumbent Mixed
Voted for the OBBBA's 10-year AI preemption in May 2025, then introduced local-control protection and NDA-ban bills in August 2026 as data centers became a campaign issue.
- Voted Yea on H.R. 1 (OBBBA) including SEC. 43201, a 10-year moratorium on state and local enforcement of any law regulating AI systems — a provision broad enough to cover data center zoning. Stripped by the Senate 99-1. (2025-05-22 — source)
- Introduced H.R. 10119, the Protecting Local Control of Data Centers Act, prohibiting federal agencies from overriding local land-use, zoning, siting, or permitting authority for data centers. (2026-08-20 — source)
- Introduced H.R. 10118, the No Data Center NDAs Act, prohibiting members of Congress from signing NDAs about data centers including information on locations, water usage, or energy requirements. (2026-08-20 — source)
- Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)
Record read 2026-09-07.
MI-8
Kristen McDonald Rivet (Democratic) · incumbent Consensus vote only
On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.
- Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)
Record read 2026-09-22.
MI-9
Lisa McClain (Republican) · incumbent Consensus vote only
On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.
- Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)
Record read 2026-09-22.
MI-12
Rashida Tlaib (Democratic) · incumbent Guardrails
Introduced a bill banning AI data centers on federal lands, cosponsored the site-selection transparency act, and issued a statement opposing a specific data center in her district. Voted no on the Ratepayer Protection Act as too weak, calling for a national moratorium instead.
- Introduced H.R. 9939, the No AI Data Centers on Federal Lands Act, permanently banning large AI data centers (>20 MW) and associated infrastructure on all federal land including military bases. (2026-07-23 — source)
- Cosponsored H.R. 8488, the AI Data Center Site Selection Transparency Act, requiring developers to disclose location, impacts, and other information to local elected officials and the public before development. (2026-04-23 — source)
- Issued statement after Southfield City Council approved a Metrobloks AI data center, citing residents' concerns about electricity costs rising 'as much as 267%' and water consumption of 'millions of gallons per day.' (2025-12-16 — source)
- One of three members to vote no on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (passed 417-3), on the grounds that it was too weak: it “fails to meaningfully protect our communities.” Before the vote she wrote on X that “the strongest action Congress can take right now is to pass a national moratorium on data centers and enact a prohibition on federal lands.” (2026-09-16 — source)
Record read 2026-09-22.
17Latest Michigan data center news
A data center was proposed near you?
The free toolkit walks you through it in five steps: who's really behind the LLC, what it costs your community, what to do this week, and a downloadable action pack — speech, letters, flyer, and CBA targets included.
State municipal league: Michigan Municipal League