The data center fight in Decatur County, Georgia
As of September 27, 2026, Decatur County, Georgia has a data center moratorium in force (action taken April 2026).
Status is derived, not stored — a pause with a documented end date flips to Expired on its own — and the source is right next to the claim.
Status today
Indefinite moratorium on data center development; commissioners want to have a plan ready before any proposals arrive.
SourceNews
read 2026-09-11
An expiry date is the earliest a pause could have ended — extensions are common, so confirm with the clerk before citing it.
Recent news
- City approves $240 million tax break for data center developer's Decatur Township project
- New Decatur ordinance will place strict new rules for future data centers
Automated news aggregation, not human-verified — follow each link to the original outlet. Part of the story tracker, 2 headlines archived.
What to do next
- Questions to ask at the hearing — force specific answers onto the record.
- Estimate the impact — electricity, water, and rate pressure for any facility size in Georgia.
- Model CBA clauses — copy-paste language communities have actually won.
- Georgia briefing — rates, grid carbon, PUC contacts, and every fight in the state.
Nearby in Georgia
- Colquitt County (55 mi) — Enactedterm not documented
- Dougherty County (61 mi) — Enactedexpires 2027-02-27
- Lowndes County (77 mi) — Enactedexpires soon — 2026-10-25
- Troup County (158 mi) — Rescindedterm not documented
- LaGrange (158 mi) — Enactedterm not documented
- Pike County (160 mi) — Enactedterm not documented
- Lamar County (160 mi) — Enactedterm not documented
- Hogansville (166 mi) — Expiredterm ran to 2026-09-01
All 46 tracked actions in Georgia are on the state page.
As of August 2026 · changes weekly — re-check before citing
Illustrative rather than exhaustive — dozens of localities churn weekly, and this tracks the ones we have read a source for. **Each row carries its own provenance.** Rows showing a verification date link to the ordinance, the enacting body's own page, or a datable report of the vote, and were read on that date. Rows marked *unverified* came from bulk compilation and have not been checked against a primary source — the locality, the year, and the status may all be off. Verify one of those with the town clerk before citing it as precedent. **Expiry is derived, not asserted.** A row with a documented end date flips to *Expired* on its own once that date passes. A time-limited moratorium whose start date was never documented keeps showing as enacted — that is a known gap, not a claim that it is still in force. Moratoriums are also routinely extended, so an expiry date is the earliest it could have ended, not proof that it did.
Part of the U.S. data center moratorium tracker — open data, CC BY 4.0.