The data center fight in Ralls County, Missouri
As of September 27, 2026, Ralls County, Missouri has a data center moratorium in force (action taken 2026-08-20; documented end date 2027-08-20).
Status is derived, not stored — a pause with a documented end date flips to Expired on its own — and the source is right next to the claim.
Status today
Commissioners signed a one-year moratorium on economic development projects and data centers after learning a property owner may have signed a deal to sell 53 acres to a data center company. Commissioners want voters to decide on the April ballot whether the county should allow data centers.
SourceNews
read 2026-09-06
An expiry date is the earliest a pause could have ended — extensions are common, so confirm with the clerk before citing it.
What to do next
- Questions to ask at the hearing — force specific answers onto the record.
- Estimate the impact — electricity, water, and rate pressure for any facility size in Missouri.
- Model CBA clauses — copy-paste language communities have actually won.
- Missouri briefing — rates, grid carbon, PUC contacts, and every fight in the state.
Nearby in Missouri
- Palmyra (18 mi) — Enactedterm not documented
- Marion County (19 mi) — Rescindedterm not documented
- Columbia (59 mi) — Enactedfixed term, end date not recorded
- St. Peters (69 mi) — Enactedexpires 2027-05-14
- St. Charles County (73 mi) — Enactedexpires 2027-01-13
- City of St. Charles (74 mi) — Enactedno end date — permanent
- Pacific (84 mi) — Enactedexpires 2027-08-04
- Camdenton (124 mi) — Enactedexpires 2027-05-05
All 18 tracked actions in Missouri are on the state page.
As of August 2026 · changes weekly — re-check before citing
Illustrative rather than exhaustive — dozens of localities churn weekly, and this tracks the ones we have read a source for. **Each row carries its own provenance.** Rows showing a verification date link to the ordinance, the enacting body's own page, or a datable report of the vote, and were read on that date. Rows marked *unverified* came from bulk compilation and have not been checked against a primary source — the locality, the year, and the status may all be off. Verify one of those with the town clerk before citing it as precedent. **Expiry is derived, not asserted.** A row with a documented end date flips to *Expired* on its own once that date passes. A time-limited moratorium whose start date was never documented keeps showing as enacted — that is a known gap, not a claim that it is still in force. Moratoriums are also routinely extended, so an expiry date is the earliest it could have ended, not proof that it did.
Part of the U.S. data center moratorium tracker — open data, CC BY 4.0.