State briefing

New York: data centers & your electric bill

As of October 1, 2026, AI GridWatch tracks 16 data center moratoriums or pushback actions in New York: 13 in force, 3 proposed. The state has 155 tracked data center facilities using an estimated 4.5 TWh of electricity a year.

Everything GridWatch tracks in New York on one page — proposed projects, moratoriums, permits, officials, and the 2026 ballot.

Subscribe by RSS — moratorium changes and community headlines for New York.

155tracked data center facilities
4.5 TWhestimated annual DC electricity
29.9¢residential rate per kWh
250grid gCO₂/kWh · water stress: low

As of July 2026 (3m ago) · changes over months · Source: U.S. Data Center Power Map by State — ElectricChoice.com compilation (updated July 2026; CC-BY 4.0). Underlying load research: LBNL 2024 US Data Center Energy Usage Report; rates: EIA

Facility counts vary by directory because each one draws the boundary differently — DataCenterMap lists 44 in Alabama where this table says 35, since it counts small network rooms alongside hyperscale campuses. Cite the TWh figure rather than the facility count when you can; it is the number that speaks to grid impact. Underlying load research is LBNL-2001637 (Dec 2024).

Happening now
1Proposed data centers in New York (3)

2 still live · 1 decided or withdrawn. Each name links to the full dossier — ownership, intelligence log, and where to read the paper trail.

ProjectWhereSizeBehind itStageSource
Project Double Reed (Stream US Data Centers at STAMP)Alabama (Genesee County)600 MWStream Data CentersAwaiting decisionSource
read 2026-08-14
TeraWulf Cayuga data center (former Cayuga Power Plant)Lansing (Tompkins County)300 MWTeraWulfAwaiting decisionSource
read 2026-08-14
Anthropic Lake MarinerBarker (Somerset)42 MWAI XPV PlatformOperatingSource
read 2026-08-14

Full project tracker →

2Pushback already happening in New York
WhereLevelStatusNoteSource
Lysander (Onondaga Co.)LocalEnactedexpires soon — 2026-11-066-month; no applications accepted by Town, Planning or Zoning boardsSourceNews
read 2026-08-04
Perth (Fulton Co.)LocalEnactedexpires 2027-06-041-year, passed 3-0; extendable by simple resolutionSourceNews
read 2026-08-04
Tonawanda (Erie Co.)LocalEnactedexpires 2027-08-03Local Law 2-2026: 1-year pause on facilities drawing 20 MW or more — a lower threshold than the state EO's 50 MWSourceNews
read 2026-08-04
Newfield (Tompkins Co.)LocalEnactedexpires 2027-07-091-year townwide pause on data processing centers and cryptocurrency mining; town is drafting comprehensive-plan amendments before it lapsesSourceNews
read 2026-08-04
St. Lawrence CountyLocalProposedterm not documentedThe county did not adopt a moratorium of its own — it passed a resolution affirming local zoning authority and urging its municipalities to consider one. Tracked as a signal, not a restrictionSourceRoundup
read 2026-08-04
Mohawk (Montgomery Co.)LocalEnactedexpires 2027-02-136-month moratorium adopted after public hearing; supervisor cites the state EO's 50 MW floor as leaving smaller facilities unregulated.SourceNews
read 2026-09-11
New York (statewide)StateEnactedno fixed end — runs until a condition is metEO 62: first statewide pause. Holds DEC discretionary approvals for 50+ MW facilities until DPS finishes a generic environmental impact statement — roughly a year, but tied to that study, not a fixed dateSourceOfficial
read 2026-08-04
New York (S10642/A11560)StateProposedterm not documentedResponsible Data Center Development Act: 1-year moratorium on state permits for 20+ MW facilities, plus a dedicated utility rate class, a DEC impact study, and a host-community benefit program. Passed the Senate 43-17. Per the Senate's own record it had not been delivered to the Governor as of Aug 4, 2026 — Hochul acted by executive order (EO 62, 50 MW floor) instead. Still live, and stricter than the EOSourceOfficial
read 2026-08-04
IslipLocalEnactedexpires 2028-02-1218-month ban on new data center facilities; second Long Island town after BrookhavenSourceNews
read 2026-08-13
BrookhavenLocalEnactedexpires 2028-01-1718-month moratorium, unanimous after nearly 6 hours of public hearings; town code doesn't currently define data centers. First Long Island town to actSourceNews
read 2026-08-13
East FishkillLocalEnactedexpires 2029-07-013-year moratorium, unanimous, running to Jul 1, 2029. Halts Treetop Companies' proposed 1.16M sq ft campus south of Old State RoadSourceNews
read 2026-08-23
HighlandLocalEnactedexpires 2027-06-18Local Law No. 1 of 2026: 12-month moratorium on large-scale data center development, extendable to 24 months. Sullivan County town; preemptive, no project proposedSourceOfficial
read 2026-09-06
LeRayLocalEnactedexpires 2027-08-01Town board approved one-year moratorium on data centers after public hearing. Prompted by a broker marketing hundreds of acres for a data center near Watertown/Fort Drum.SourceNews
read 2026-09-06
OrangetownTownEnactedexpires 2027-02-25Local Law 5, 2026: 6-month moratorium on data centers and battery energy storage systems; does not apply to DataBank Phase 2 already in review.SourceNews
read 2026-09-11
CantonTownEnactedexpires 2027-05-31Moratorium on data center development until May 31, 2027; exempts existing operations and facilities under 20 MW.SourceNews
read 2026-09-11
PotsdamTownProposedterm not documentedTown councilor drafted moratorium resolution; planned for August public hearing; outcome not confirmed.SourceNews
read 2026-09-11

As of August 2026 (2m ago) · changes weekly — re-check before citing

Illustrative rather than exhaustive — dozens of localities churn weekly, and this tracks the ones we have read a source for. **Each row carries its own provenance.** Rows showing a verification date link to the ordinance, the enacting body's own page, or a datable report of the vote, and were read on that date. Rows marked *unverified* came from bulk compilation and have not been checked against a primary source — the locality, the year, and the status may all be off. Verify one of those with the town clerk before citing it as precedent. **Expiry is derived, not asserted.** A row with a documented end date flips to *Expired* on its own once that date passes. A time-limited moratorium whose start date was never documented keeps showing as enacted — that is a known gap, not a claim that it is still in force. Moratoriums are also routinely extended, so an expiry date is the earliest it could have ended, not proof that it did.

3Other New York communities in the news (1)

Places with archived data-center coverage but no moratorium on file. Grouped automatically from headlines and not verified — a lead worth reading, not a claim to cite.

Story tracker →

Already built
4Every data center already built in New York

GridWatch does not yet track a named hyperscale campus in New York, but that does not mean the state has none. DataCenterMap keeps a public directory of existing facilities — street addresses included — for New York.

Browse the New York directory →

Two caveats before you cite it at a hearing: it lists facilities that already exist, so a newly proposed campus will not appear; and it counts a small network room the same as a hyperscale campus, so the facility count is not a measure of power draw or community impact.

Your leverage
5Your regulator

New York Public Service Commission — website · file a complaint

Official state energy data: EIA New York electricity profile — generation, prices, and consumption from the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

6Where the New York paper trail lives

Air & environmental permits: New York State DEC — Division of Air Resources

Searchable register: Environmental Notice Bulletin (weekly filings) — a public database you can search by facility or permit number.

Grid interconnection queue: NYISO (New York)

A routing hint only — several states are split between markets, and the serving utility is the only authority on which queue a given site is in.

These are places to look, not evidence that anything has been filed. Links were checked on 2026-08-21; search links are queries, not records.

What to request, and in what order →

Who represents you
7Your federal delegation and governor

Grades cross party — this is an issue axis, not a partisan one. A blank grade means no documented action was located, never that the official is neutral.

GradeOfficialDocumented action (sourced)Reach them
CKathy Hochul
Democratic · Governor
Weighing a data-center moratorium passed by the legislature (Jun 2026). — Rockefeller Institute — Updates on the Cloud: More Moratoriums (2026)site · contact
—Charles E. Schumer
Democratic · Senator · next on the ballot 2028
No documented action on data centers located
Guardrails Said Senate Democrats would push to make data centers "pay their fair share" and use more clean energy if they regain the majority. sources
site · contact
—Kirsten E. Gillibrand
Democratic · Senator · next on the ballot 2030
No documented action on data centers located
Guardrails Backed Gov. Hochul's one-year hyperscale data-center pause and says communities need guarantees on bills, water and air, while declining to take a position on the Stream project in Alabama, NY. sources
site · contact
—Nick LaLota
Republican · Representative 1
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Daniel S. Goldman
Democratic · Representative 10
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Nicole Malliotakis
Republican · Representative 11
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Jerrold Nadler
Democratic · Representative 12
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Adriano Espaillat
Democratic · Representative 13
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Democratic · Representative 14
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Ritchie Torres
Democratic · Representative 15
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—George Latimer
Democratic · Representative 16
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Michael Lawler
Republican · Representative 17
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Patrick Ryan
Democratic · Representative 18
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Josh Riley
Democratic · Representative 19
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Andrew R. Garbarino
Republican · Representative 2
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Paul Tonko
Democratic · Representative 20
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Elise M. Stefanik
Republican · Representative 21
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—John W. Mannion
Democratic · Representative 22
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Nicholas A. Langworthy
Republican · Representative 23
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Claudia Tenney
Republican · Representative 24
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Joseph D. Morelle
Democratic · Representative 25
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Timothy M. Kennedy
Democratic · Representative 26
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Thomas R. Suozzi
Democratic · Representative 3
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Laura Gillen
Democratic · Representative 4
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Gregory W. Meeks
Democratic · Representative 5
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Grace Meng
Democratic · Representative 6
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Nydia M. Velázquez
Democratic · Representative 7
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Hakeem S. Jeffries
Democratic · Representative 8
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Yvette D. Clarke
Democratic · Representative 9
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact

Roster: regenerated by scripts/refresh_officials.py (Senate XML + congress-legislators + current governors).

Write to your senators → Your senators in detail → Full officials scorecard → Find your state legislators →

82026 U.S. Senate

Neither New York Senate seat is on the 2026 ballot. Your senators are still the people who vote on federal siting and tax policy — their records are in the delegation table above.

92026 U.S. House races in New York (26)

A documented data-center record exists in 22 of 26 districts. A candidate with no badge colour has said nothing we could locate — that is a gap in the record, not a neutral position. ★ marks an incumbent.

DistrictPVIIncumbentCandidates
NY-1R+4Nick LaLotaNick LaLota ★ Chris Gallant
NY-2R+6Andrew GarbarinoAndrew Garbarino ★ Patrick Halpin
NY-3EVENTom SuozziTom Suozzi ★ Mike LiPetri
NY-4D+2Laura GillenLaura Gillen ★ Jeanine Driscoll
NY-5D+24Gregory MeeksGregory Meeks ★ George Marsh
NY-6D+6Grace MengGrace Meng ★ Joseph Chou
NY-7D+25Nydia VelázquezClaire Valdez Melvin Rivera
NY-8D+24Hakeem JeffriesHakeem Jeffries ★ Lewis Mizrahi
NY-9D+22Yvette ClarkeYvette Clarke ★ Joel Anabilah-Azumah
NY-10D+32Dan GoldmanBrad Lander Jennifer Moore
NY-11R+10Nicole MalliotakisNicole Malliotakis ★ Michael DeCillis
NY-12D+33Jerry NadlerCaroline Shinkle Micah Lasher
NY-13D+32Adriano EspaillatAdriano Espaillat ★ Darializa Avila Chevalier Jomo Williams Bob Cohen Candace Niles
NY-14D+19Alexandria Ocasio-CortezAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez ★ Diamant Hysenaj
NY-15D+27Ritchie TorresRitchie Torres ★ Stylo Sapaskis Andre Easton Gonzalo Duran
NY-16D+18George LatimerGeorge Latimer ★ Joseph Cinquemani
NY-17D+1Mike LawlerMike Lawler ★ Cait Conley
NY-18D+2Pat RyanPat Ryan ★ Jacqueline Auringer
NY-19D+1Josh RileyJosh Riley ★ Peter Oberacker
NY-20D+8Paul TonkoPaul Tonko ★ Ralph Ambrosio
NY-21R+10Elise StefanikAnthony Constantino Blake Gendebien
NY-22D+4John MannionJohn Mannion ★ Kailee Buller
NY-23R+10Nick LangworthyNick Langworthy ★ Aaron Gies
NY-24R+11Claudia TenneyClaudia Tenney ★ Alissa Ellman Ken Estes Todd Sloan
NY-25D+10Joseph MorelleJoseph Morelle ★ Virginia McIntyre
NY-26D+11Tim KennedyTim Kennedy ★ Dennis Hannon
The documented records (22 districts)

NY-1

Nick LaLota (Republican) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-2

Andrew Garbarino (Republican) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-3

Tom Suozzi (Democratic) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-4

Laura Gillen (Democratic) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-5

Gregory Meeks (Democratic) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-6

Grace Meng (Democratic) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-8

Hakeem Jeffries (Democratic) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-9

Yvette Clarke (Democratic) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-11

Nicole Malliotakis (Republican) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-13

Adriano Espaillat (Independent) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-14

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Democratic) · incumbent Guardrails

Introduced H.R. 9442, the AI Data Center Moratorium Act — the House companion to Sanders' S.4214 — halting new data center construction until Congress enacts community safeguards.

  • Introduced H.R. 9442, the Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act, which would halt construction or expansion of AI data centers until Congress passes safeguards and 'expressly terminates' the moratorium. (2026-06-24 — source)
  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-12.

NY-15

Ritchie Torres (Democratic) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-16

George Latimer (Democratic) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-17

Mike Lawler (Republican) · incumbent Accelerate

Opposes Gov. Hochul's data center moratorium, arguing it stifles innovation and drives businesses to other states.

  • Criticized Hochul's Executive Order 62 data center moratorium on Fox Business, saying "What she is saying is, don't come here. Go do your business elsewhere" and arguing the pause harms NY's business climate. (2026-08-18 — source)
  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-11.

NY-18

Pat Ryan (Democratic) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-19

Josh Riley (Democratic) · incumbent Guardrails

Introduced the bipartisan FAIR Data Act to keep the cost of generation, transmission and distribution upgrades for data centers off New York ratepayers.

  • Introduced the FAIR Data Act, bipartisan legislation to stop data-center projects from raising energy bills for Upstate New York families and small businesses by shielding ratepayers from the generation, transmission and distribution upgrades those projects require. (2026-07-13 — source)
  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-11.

Recent mentions (1) — automated, not verified

Headlines that name this candidate and mention data centers or AI. Matched by a script, read by nobody. A mention is a lead, not a record — do not cite one as a position.

NY-20

Paul Tonko (Democratic) · incumbent Guardrails

Co-introduced the House Power for the People Act to shield consumers from data-center-driven energy costs; says data centers should be built in communities that want them.

  • Co-introduced H.R. 8241, the Power for the People Act of 2026, with Rep. Kweisi Mfume — the House companion to S.3682 on data-center rate classes and FERC cost allocation. (2026-04-09 — source)
  • Said data centers "should be built in communities that want them" regarding the proposed Kenwood Commons project in Bethlehem. (2026-08-11 — source)
  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-11.

NY-22

John Mannion (Democratic) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-23

Nick Langworthy (Republican) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-24

Claudia Tenney (Republican) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-25

Joseph Morelle (Democratic) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

NY-26

Tim Kennedy (Democratic) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

All 440 House races →

Stay informed
10Latest New York data center news

All New York news → Live news search →

11Video coverage mentioning New York
▶
NYS Asm Scott Gray (R) discusses New York's data center moratorium
▶
AI-driven data center demand sparks community discussion in Central New York
▶
New York becomes the first state to impose a data center moratorium

All video coverage for New York →

A data center was proposed near you?

The free toolkit walks you through it in five steps: who's really behind the LLC, what it costs your community, what to do this week, and a downloadable action pack — speech, letters, flyer, and CBA targets included.

Start here → The health risks, sourced

State municipal league: NY State Conference of Mayors (NYCOM)

Toolkit States Tracker Search