Community briefing

The data center fight in Coachella, California

As of October 1, 2026, Coachella, California has a data center moratorium in force (action taken Aug 26, 2026).

Status is derived, not stored — a pause with a documented end date flips to Expired on its own — and the source is right next to the claim.

Status today

Enactedno end date — permanentstatus
Aug 26, 2026action taken
Locallevel

Permanent ban: Ordinance No. 1231, adopted unanimously Aug 26, 2026 (first reading Aug 12, also unanimous), prohibits large-scale data centers in all zoning districts, effective 30 days after adoption; accessory server rooms and IT facilities incidental to a permitted use are exempt. Replaces the 45-day moratorium adopted Jun 4 alongside terminating the city's agreement with Stronghold Power over a 400+-acre, six-data-center campus, later extended through Jun 3, 2027. Second California city to ban data centers, after Monterey Park; first in the Coachella Valley. Mayor Figueroa asked staff to explore a ballot measure to entrench the ban. Corroborated by KESQ, NBC Palm Springs, The Riverside Record, MyNewsLA and KVCR.

SourceNews
read 2026-08-29

An expiry date is the earliest a pause could have ended — extensions are common, so confirm with the clerk before citing it.

Recent news

10 stories tracked since 2026-05-28 across 4 outlets. 8× Local officials are moving to pause or block the project. 1× Water use for cooling is straining the local supply. Most recent: “Coachella becomes second California city to ban data centers as opposition swells in Golden State” (kvcrnews.org, 2026-08-28).

Automated news aggregation, not human-verified — follow each link to the original outlet. Part of the story tracker, 10 headlines archived.

What to do next

Build a full action pack →

Nearby in California

All 26 tracked actions in California are on the state page.

As of August 2026 (2m ago) · changes weekly — re-check before citing

Illustrative rather than exhaustive — dozens of localities churn weekly, and this tracks the ones we have read a source for. **Each row carries its own provenance.** Rows showing a verification date link to the ordinance, the enacting body's own page, or a datable report of the vote, and were read on that date. Rows marked *unverified* came from bulk compilation and have not been checked against a primary source — the locality, the year, and the status may all be off. Verify one of those with the town clerk before citing it as precedent. **Expiry is derived, not asserted.** A row with a documented end date flips to *Expired* on its own once that date passes. A time-limited moratorium whose start date was never documented keeps showing as enacted — that is a known gap, not a claim that it is still in force. Moratoriums are also routinely extended, so an expiry date is the earliest it could have ended, not proof that it did.

Part of the U.S. data center moratorium tracker — open data, CC BY 4.0.

Toolkit States Tracker Search