Project dossier · Toronto (Deuel County), South Dakota

Applied Digital Deuel County (withdrawn) Withdrawn

$5B, 430MW campus near Toronto, SD; withdrawn after 2026 legislature rejected a sales-tax exemption for data centers.

Key facts

Operator
Applied Digital
Size
430 MW
Location
Toronto (Deuel County), South Dakota
Stage today
Withdrawn

Source

What to do next

Next step: Withdrawn — confirm it is dead in the record and watch for the same site resurfacing under a new name or LLC.

Build an action pack for this project →

What has happened so far (8 events)

  • 2025-04-15announcement
    Applied Digital proposed a ~$5B, 430MW AI data center campus (two ~907,500 sq ft buildings) on a 150-200 acre site east of Toronto in Deuel County, South Dakota, with total project impact estimated at $10-16 billion. · source
  • 2026-01-30coverage
    South Dakota Searchlight reported the clock was ticking on a data center tax incentive proposal as the legislative session and elections loomed, with Applied Digital's Deuel County project tied to the outcome. · source
  • 2026-02-05vote
    The South Dakota House State Affairs Committee voted 9-3 to kill House Bill 1005, which would have granted a 50-year sales tax exemption on data center equipment and software purchases. · source
  • 2026-02-18vote
    Senate committees advanced competing data center bills: SB 135 (requiring data centers to pay their own costs, 5-4) and SB 239 (a narrower 30-year tax exemption, 6-3); Applied Digital VP said losing the exemption would cost roughly $2B more to build in South Dakota. · source
  • 2026-03-05vote
    A data center regulation bill passed the South Dakota House as the legislature moved toward restrictions rather than incentives. · source
  • 2026-03-25ruling
    Governor Larry Rhoden signed SB 135 and related bills into law, requiring data centers to cover their own electricity rate impacts and water-use costs and protecting local ordinances. · source
  • 2026-04-02withdrawal
    Applied Digital VP Nick Phillips said the $5B Deuel County project 'doesn't make sense at this time' after the legislature's rejection of tax incentives, confirming the company would let its land agreement near Toronto lapse. · source
  • 2026-07-01report
    New state laws took effect including data center regulatory measures (electricity cost pass-through bans, water-use disclosure, local ordinance protection) enacted after the incentive bills failed. · source

Find the paper trail

Find the paper trail (0 filed · 12 places to look)

State environmental permits

Backup generators, water withdrawal and stormwater are permitted by the state, usually earlier and in more detail than anything filed locally.

County & town filings

The rezoning application, site plan, traffic and noise studies, staff report and every revision.

Utility & grid records

The electricity request is filed with the grid operator and the utility long before the town hears about it — and states the real load.

Federal databases

Works anywhere, and covers the operator's record at its other sites.

  • EPA ECHO facility searchEvery federally-reported air, water and waste permit at a facility, plus its inspection and violation history. Search by address or draw a radius around the site.
  • EPA EnvirofactsThe same underlying records, queryable by county — useful for 'what else is permitted near this site' rather than one facility.
  • EPA Facility Registry ServiceResolves the shell LLC on a permit to the facility it belongs to. Worth a look when the filing name means nothing locally.

These are places to look, not evidence that anything has been filed. Links were checked on 2026-08-21; search links are queries, not records. What to ask for.

Around here

Other tracked projects in South Dakota

Cite this page: GridWatch AI, “Applied Digital Deuel County (withdrawn)”, aigridwatch.com/projects/applied-digital-toronto-sd, retrieved 2026-10-11.

As of August 2026 (2m ago) · changes weekly — re-check before citing

A working set of identified proposals a community can track, not a census — most of the country's activity is not in here yet. Pennsylvania is the exception: its rows are synced from PA DEP's own data-center permit tracker, so the state's coverage is close to complete and carries the permit trail with it. **Each row carries its own provenance.** Rows showing a verification date link to reporting or the governing body's own record and were read on that date; rows marked *unverified* have no source on record — a lead to check, not a fact to cite. **Stage is derived, not asserted.** *Hearing scheduled*, *Awaiting decision*, *Approved* and *Withdrawn* are computed from each row's milestone dates on every rebuild, so a hearing date that has passed stops reading 'scheduled'. Hearings get moved and projects re-file under new names — treat a scheduled date as the earliest to act by, and confirm with the clerk before relying on it. Leads are mined into data/project_candidates.json and promoted here only after a human reads a primary source.

Part of the data center project tracker — open data, CC BY 4.0 (JSON · CSV).

Toolkit States Tracker Search