State briefing

Alabama: data centers & your electric bill

As of October 1, 2026, AI GridWatch tracks 15 data center moratoriums or pushback actions in Alabama: 14 in force, 1 expired, rejected or rescinded. The state has 35 tracked data center facilities using an estimated 0.6 TWh of electricity a year.

Everything GridWatch tracks in Alabama on one page — proposed projects, moratoriums, permits, officials, and the 2026 ballot.

Subscribe by RSS — moratorium changes and community headlines for Alabama.

35tracked data center facilities
0.6 TWhestimated annual DC electricity
16.8¢residential rate per kWh
380grid gCO₂/kWh · water stress: low

As of July 2026 (3m ago) · changes over months · Source: U.S. Data Center Power Map by State — ElectricChoice.com compilation (updated July 2026; CC-BY 4.0). Underlying load research: LBNL 2024 US Data Center Energy Usage Report; rates: EIA

Facility counts vary by directory because each one draws the boundary differently — DataCenterMap lists 44 in Alabama where this table says 35, since it counts small network rooms alongside hyperscale campuses. Cite the TWh figure rather than the facility count when you can; it is the number that speaks to grid impact. Underlying load research is LBNL-2001637 (Dec 2024).

Happening now
1Proposed data centers in Alabama (3)

1 still live · 2 decided or withdrawn. Each name links to the full dossier — ownership, intelligence log, and where to read the paper trail.

ProjectWhereSizeBehind itStageSource
Project MarvelBessemer700 acLogistics Land InvestmentIn reviewUnverified
Meta HuntsvilleToney (Madison County)146 MWMetaUnder constructionSource
read 2026-08-14
Meta MontgomeryMontgomery153 MWMetaUnder constructionSource
read 2026-08-14

Full project tracker →

2Pushback already happening in Alabama
WhereLevelStatusNoteSource
BirminghamLocalExpiredterm ran to 2026-09-036-month moratorium on 20+ MW facilities, unanimous. Exempts the Nebius AI factory project (application already under review). On Jun 9, 2026 the council passed data center regulations 6-3, to take effect when the moratorium liftedSourceNews
read 2026-09-29
HomewoodLocalEnactedexpires 2027-06-2212-month moratorium, extendable 6 months. Preemptive — no data center proposals pending. Staff and Planning Commission to study zoning, operational, and infrastructure standardsSourceNews
read 2026-08-13
LeedsLocalEnactedexpires 2027-06-031-year moratorium on data center applications and permits, unanimous (Ord. 2026-06-02). Preemptive — no active proposals, but residents flagged Alabama Power marketing of nearby Grand River site to data center developersSourceNews
read 2026-08-13
SpringvilleLocalEnactedexpires 2027-07-061-year moratorium on data center proposals. Preemptive — no proposals in pipelineSourceNews
read 2026-08-13
CullmanLocalEnactedexpires 2027-06-2412-month moratorium, unanimous (Res. 2026-116). Council also referred Ord. 2026-42 to Planning Commission to prohibit data centers outright. County cannot follow suit — limited home ruleSourceNews
read 2026-08-13
Fort PayneLocalEnactedexpires 2026-12-166-month moratorium, unanimous. Preemptive — no developer inquiries. Proposed zoning: M2 heavy-industrial only, conditional use, 1,000-ft residential setback, EIS, water-use plan, noise standardsSourceNews
read 2026-08-13
PinsonLocalEnactedexpires 2027-08-071-year moratorium targeting hyper/mega data centers, especially AI facilities. Preemptive — no proposals pendingSourceNews
read 2026-09-11
FairfieldLocalEnactedterm not documentedTemporary moratorium after resident pressure over Patmos (Missouri AI co.) proposal to convert former Walmart to colocation data center. Duration not specifiedSourceNews
read 2026-08-13
PrichardLocalEnactedexpires 2027-02-04City Council approved a six-month moratorium on data centers, days after a building permit was issued to Edged Energy for a $93 million data center on July 30. The timing created a legal dispute over whether the Edged project is grandfathered.SourceNews
read 2026-09-06
HarpersvilleCityEnactedexpires 2027-02-03Town council approved 6-month moratorium to study economic and infrastructure impacts of data centersSourceNews
read 2026-09-11
TarrantCityEnactedexpires 2027-09-0812-month moratorium on data center business licenses; Mayor Tracie Threadford cited caution while city conducts feasibility studySourceNews
read 2026-09-11
AnnistonCityEnactedexpires 2027-08-18Resolution No. 26-R-97 establishing 12-month moratorium on permitting, development, and licensing of data centersSourceNews
read 2026-09-11
WestoverCityEnactedexpires 2027-02-18City council unanimously approved 6-month moratorium on data centers; prompted by proposed 437-acre projectSourceNews
read 2026-09-11
FoleyCityEnactedexpires 2027-03-086-month moratorium on data centers, cryptocurrency mining, server farms; preemptive — no active proposals; covers acceptance, processing, and approval of applicationsSourceNews
read 2026-09-11
Lowndes CountyCountyEnactedexpires soon — 2026-10-25County commissioners unanimously approved 60-day moratorium on data center permits; response to proposed 1,050-acre "Project Red Clay" hyperscale data center; county lacks formal zoning authority, legal standing uncertainSourceNews
read 2026-09-11

As of August 2026 (2m ago) · changes weekly — re-check before citing

Illustrative rather than exhaustive — dozens of localities churn weekly, and this tracks the ones we have read a source for. **Each row carries its own provenance.** Rows showing a verification date link to the ordinance, the enacting body's own page, or a datable report of the vote, and were read on that date. Rows marked *unverified* came from bulk compilation and have not been checked against a primary source — the locality, the year, and the status may all be off. Verify one of those with the town clerk before citing it as precedent. **Expiry is derived, not asserted.** A row with a documented end date flips to *Expired* on its own once that date passes. A time-limited moratorium whose start date was never documented keeps showing as enacted — that is a known gap, not a claim that it is still in force. Moratoriums are also routinely extended, so an expiry date is the earliest it could have ended, not proof that it did.

3Other Alabama communities in the news (2)

Places with archived data-center coverage but no moratorium on file. Grouped automatically from headlines and not verified — a lead worth reading, not a claim to cite.

Story tracker →

Already built
4Known data center campuses in Alabama
OperatorLocationTenantFiling LLC
GoogleJackson CountyGoogleLand-acquisition shells: Jet Stream LLC, Sharka LLC
MetaHuntsvilleMetaCodename shells: Greater Kudu, Raven Northbrook, Stadion, Wobniar, Pinnacle Mountain
MetaMontgomeryMetaCodename shells: Greater Kudu, Raven Northbrook, Stadion, Wobniar, Pinnacle Mountain

⏳ No verification date recorded · changes over months · Source: Operator ownership & filing-LLC naming patterns — compiled from operator releases and county filings, then checked against SEC EDGAR full-text search. Composite, not a single citation: look the entity up yourself before naming it in a filing

Each row carries its own attribution level — first-party rows come from the operator's own site, but colocation and REIT ownership was compiled from trade press and never passed an independent fact-check. Check the attribution column before citing a row.

5Every data center already built in Alabama

The campuses above are the ones GridWatch tracks by operator and filing LLC. For the full inventory — street addresses of every existing facility, including the smaller colocation and network sites — DataCenterMap keeps a public directory for Alabama.

Browse the Alabama directory →

Two caveats before you cite it at a hearing: it lists facilities that already exist, so a newly proposed campus will not appear; and it counts a small network room the same as a hyperscale campus, so the facility count is not a measure of power draw or community impact.

Your leverage
6Your regulator

Alabama Public Service Commission — website · file a complaint

Official state energy data: EIA Alabama electricity profile — generation, prices, and consumption from the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

7Where the Alabama paper trail lives

Air & environmental permits: Alabama Dept. of Environmental Management (ADEM)

Searchable register: ADEM eFile document search — a public database you can search by facility or permit number.

No organised market. There is no interconnection queue to read here; the utility's own resource plan and the PUC docket are the record.

These are places to look, not evidence that anything has been filed. Links were checked on 2026-08-21; search links are queries, not records.

What to request, and in what order →

Who represents you
8Your federal delegation and governor

Grades cross party — this is an issue axis, not a partisan one. A blank grade means no documented action was located, never that the official is neutral.

GradeOfficialDocumented action (sourced)Reach them
—Kay Ivey
Republican · Governor
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Katie Boyd Britt
Republican · Senator · next on the ballot 2028
No documented action on data centers located
Guardrails Britt co-sponsors the Advancing Water Reuse Act (S. 3585) with Sen. Luján, which would create a 30% tax credit for on-site water recycling including at data centers; says siting decisions belong at the local level, opposes both a moratorium and "a data center on every corner," and wants the Trump administration's voluntary Ratepayer Protection Pledge turned into law. sources
site · contact
—Tommy Tuberville
Republican · Senator · on the 2026 ballot
No documented action on data centers located
Mixed Tuberville, running for Alabama governor, has defended data centers and attributed local opposition to Chinese social-media influence, and in a September 2026 op-ed said local communities should decide whether to host one, data centers should sit in Alabama's highest property-tax bracket and pay the full cost of transmission, substations and water systems, and he would freeze Alabama Power rates. sources
site · contact
—Barry Moore
Republican · Representative 1
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Shomari Figures
Democratic · Representative 2
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Mike Rogers
Republican · Representative 3
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Robert B. Aderholt
Republican · Representative 4
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Dale W. Strong
Republican · Representative 5
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Gary J. Palmer
Republican · Representative 6
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact
—Terri A. Sewell
Democratic · Representative 7
No documented action on data centers locatedsite · contact

Roster: regenerated by scripts/refresh_officials.py (Senate XML + congress-legislators + current governors).

Write to your senators → Your senators in detail → Full officials scorecard → Find your state legislators →

92026 U.S. Senate race

PVI R+15 · Seat held by Tommy Tuberville (Republican) · Incumbent retiring to run for governor

Barry Moore (Republican) No record found

No documented statement or action on data centers located. Not scored — see how this page treats silence.

Everett Wess (Democratic) No record found

No documented statement or action on data centers located. Not scored — see how this page treats silence.

Ballot roster: state candidate list (read 2026-08-25).

All 35 Senate races →

102026 U.S. House races in Alabama (7)

A documented data-center record exists in 6 of 7 districts. A candidate with no badge colour has said nothing we could locate — that is a gap in the record, not a neutral position. ★ marks an incumbent.

DistrictPVIIncumbentCandidates
AL-1R+17Barry Moore Redistricted from theClyde Jones Jr. Jerry Carl
AL-2R+7Shomari FiguresShomari Figures ★ Rhett Marques
AL-3R+23Mike RogersMike Rogers ★ Lee McInnis
AL-4R+33Robert AderholtRobert Aderholt ★ Amanda Pusczek
AL-5R+15Dale StrongDale Strong ★ Andrew Sneed
AL-6R+17Gary PalmerGary Palmer ★ Maurice Mercer
AL-7D+10Terri SewellTerri Sewell ★ Ammie Akin
The documented records (6 districts)

AL-2

Shomari Figures (Democratic) · incumbent Guardrails

Sided with Lowndes County residents opposing a proposed 1,050-acre data center, demanding community consent for data center siting

  • Statement at Lowndes County event opposing proposed data center: 'I'm with the people of Lowndes County'; demands community consent for data center siting (2026-08-01 — source)
  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-11.

AL-3

Mike Rogers (Republican) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

Recent mentions (3) — automated, not verified

Headlines that name this candidate and mention data centers or AI. Matched by a script, read by nobody. A mention is a lead, not a record — do not cite one as a position.

AL-4

Robert Aderholt (Republican) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

AL-5

Dale Strong (Republican) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

AL-6

Gary Palmer (Republican) · incumbent Consensus vote only

On the record only for voting yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act (417-3). No other data-center record located yet.

  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-22.

AL-7

Terri Sewell (Democratic) · incumbent Guardrails

Cosponsored the AI Data Center Moratorium Act (HR 9442) calling for a pause on new data center construction until federal standards protect communities

  • Cosponsored AI Data Center Moratorium Act (HR 9442) to temporarily halt data center construction until federal guardrails are established; said 'Responsible innovation and community protection are not competing goals' (2026-07-22 — source)
  • Voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed 417-3 (roll call 312). It directs state utility commissions to consider rate designs making data centers with 100 MW or more of peak demand at one site pay the full incremental cost of the generation and grid upgrades they require. A near-unanimous vote: shown on the record, not scored on its own. (2026-09-16 — source)

Record read 2026-09-11.

All 440 House races →

Stay informed
11Latest Alabama data center news

No Alabama data-center headlines in this week's national scan — local coverage often runs ahead of it.

Search live Alabama data center news → GridWatch news feed →

A data center was proposed near you?

The free toolkit walks you through it in five steps: who's really behind the LLC, what it costs your community, what to do this week, and a downloadable action pack — speech, letters, flyer, and CBA targets included.

Start here → The health risks, sourced

State municipal league: Alabama League of Municipalities

Toolkit States Tracker Search