Project dossier · Montgomery County, Missouri

Amazon Montgomery County Data Center Under construction

Multibillion-dollar Amazon DC; announced amid statewide regulatory debate (HB 3362 failed).

Key facts

Operator
Amazon
Location
Montgomery County, Missouri
Stage today
Under construction

Source
read 2026-08-19

What to do next

Next step: Under construction — pull the approved conditions and permits and hold the builder to them; an expansion or a new building reopens the record.

Build an action pack for this project →

What has happened so far (15 events)

  • 2024-11-01filing
    Administrative review completed for the Amazon-linked Project Green data center land-use proposal in Montgomery County near New Florence. · source
  • 2024-12-01vote
    Montgomery County Commission approved the still-unnamed Project Green development (later confirmed as Amazon). · source
  • 2025-12-03rezoning
    Montgomery County Commission approved land for two large-scale data center projects (Project Green/Amazon ~1,000 acres and Project Spade/Google ~780 acres) at the I-70/Highway 19 interchange. · source
  • 2025-12-19incentive
    Montgomery County Commission voted unanimously to approve a tax abatement framework for the AWS data center (min. $8.5B capital investment, 4-17 buildings, projected $326M-$1.5B in property tax revenue, min. 150 FT jobs at ~$85,000/yr). · source
  • 2026-01-01public-comment
    A town hall on the Google/Amazon data center projects drew hundreds of residents to Montgomery County High School, with attendees voicing uncertainty and fear. · source
  • 2026-02-16lawsuit
    Preserve Montgomery County LLC sued Montgomery County and the Missouri DED alleging roughly a dozen Missouri Sunshine Law violations tied to the Amazon data center approval — closed-door sessions, NDAs with Amazon, improper meeting notice. Sought invalidation of the county agreements. · source
  • 2026-02-26filing
    Missouri Reps. Wellenkamp and Costlow introduced HB 3362, the AI Infrastructure, Grid Integrity and Water Resources Protection Act, requiring large-load customers to cover grid-infrastructure costs, obtain DNR permits for large water use, and including a grid-emergency kill switch provision. · source
  • 2026-03-01hearing
    Missouri House committee held a hearing on HB 3362 with almost exclusively supportive testimony; Montgomery County resident Sylvia Kueny testified about community concerns. The bill never advanced to a floor vote. · source
  • 2026-04-09lawsuit
    A separate citizens group Wake Up JeffCo filed its own lawsuit challenging data-center development processes in the region. · source
  • 2026-06-15announcement
    Amazon and Gov. Kehoe announced a $10 billion AWS data center campus (~1,000 acres) in Montgomery County: 400+ direct jobs, Amazon covering 100% of grid connection costs, and over $7 million in community contributions. Announcement came while Sunshine Law litigation was still pending. · source
  • 2026-06-16construction
    Gov. Kehoe attended a groundbreaking event for the Amazon data center project in Montgomery City. · source
  • 2026-06-18protest
    About 100 protesters rallied in Jefferson City ahead of a data-center policy summit, citing the Amazon Montgomery County announcement and warning officials they would be voted out over inadequate corporate tax contributions. · source
  • 2026-06-23public-comment
    Amazon hosted a public information open house at Montgomery County Middle School while the Missouri Rural Crisis Center held a concurrent press conference outside voicing opposition. · source
  • 2026-06-29report
    St. Louis Public Radio reported the Missouri legislature passed no data-center regulation this session despite HB 3362/HB 3390, and that a House Special Committee hearing is set for September 2026. · source
  • 2026-07-02coverage
    Missouri Independent reported that data-center backlash spilled into Missouri primary races, with GOP candidates demanding stronger regulation and fair tax contribution from developers. · source

Find the paper trail

Find the paper trail (0 filed · 12 places to look)

State environmental permits

Backup generators, water withdrawal and stormwater are permitted by the state, usually earlier and in more detail than anything filed locally.

County & town filings

The rezoning application, site plan, traffic and noise studies, staff report and every revision.

Utility & grid records

The electricity request is filed with the grid operator and the utility long before the town hears about it — and states the real load.

Federal databases

Works anywhere, and covers the operator's record at its other sites.

  • EPA ECHO facility searchEvery federally-reported air, water and waste permit at a facility, plus its inspection and violation history. Search by address or draw a radius around the site. This project's locality centres on 38.950, -91.500 — search that point with a 5-mile radius.
  • EPA EnvirofactsThe same underlying records, queryable by county — useful for 'what else is permitted near this site' rather than one facility.
  • EPA Facility Registry ServiceResolves the shell LLC on a permit to the facility it belongs to. Worth a look when the filing name means nothing locally.

These are places to look, not evidence that anything has been filed. Links were checked on 2026-08-21; search links are queries, not records. What to ask for.

Around here

Other tracked projects in Missouri

Cite this page: GridWatch AI, “Amazon Montgomery County Data Center”, aigridwatch.com/projects/amazon-montgomery-county-mo, retrieved 2026-10-11.

As of August 2026 (2m ago) · changes weekly — re-check before citing

A working set of identified proposals a community can track, not a census — most of the country's activity is not in here yet. Pennsylvania is the exception: its rows are synced from PA DEP's own data-center permit tracker, so the state's coverage is close to complete and carries the permit trail with it. **Each row carries its own provenance.** Rows showing a verification date link to reporting or the governing body's own record and were read on that date; rows marked *unverified* have no source on record — a lead to check, not a fact to cite. **Stage is derived, not asserted.** *Hearing scheduled*, *Awaiting decision*, *Approved* and *Withdrawn* are computed from each row's milestone dates on every rebuild, so a hearing date that has passed stops reading 'scheduled'. Hearings get moved and projects re-file under new names — treat a scheduled date as the earliest to act by, and confirm with the clerk before relying on it. Leads are mined into data/project_candidates.json and promoted here only after a human reads a primary source.

Part of the data center project tracker — open data, CC BY 4.0 (JSON · CSV).

Toolkit States Tracker Search