Project dossier · Socorro (Socorro County), New Mexico

Green Data Socorro campus (New Mexico Tech land) Withdrawn

Green Data Centers CEO Jason Bak proposed a 10,000-acre campus on New Mexico Tech land west of M Mountain and north of Highway 60 outside Socorro, powered by a 10 GW solar array delivering ~2 GW of base-load power, with atmospheric water generation for a water-neutral design; it was unveiled March 25, 2026 at a Socorro Electric Cooperative board meeting. After a raucous May town hall, New Mexico Tech announced June 2 it would not move forward, saying it lacks sufficient contiguous, undeveloped parcels for the ~16-square-mile footprint. Socorro County commissioners then unanimously adopted a one-year moratorium on data centers and supporting infrastructure on June 9.

Key facts

Operator
Green Data Centers
Owner
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (proposed site)
Size
2,000 MW
Acres
10,000
Location
Socorro (Socorro County), New Mexico
First proposed
2026-03-25
Decided
2026-06-02
Stage today
Withdrawn

Source
read 2026-08-14

What to do next

Next step: Withdrawn — confirm it is dead in the record and watch for the same site resurfacing under a new name or LLC.

Build an action pack for this project →

What has happened so far (3 events)

  • 2026-03-25announcement
    Green Data Centers CEO Jason Bak presented the proposed 10,000-acre project at a Socorro Electric Co-op board meeting, in collaboration with New Mexico Tech. · source
  • 2026-06-02withdrawal
    New Mexico Tech announced it would not move forward with the proposed data center, citing insufficient contiguous, undeveloped parcels for the project's footprint. · source
  • 2026-06-09vote
    Socorro County commissioners unanimously adopted a one-year moratorium on development of data centers and supporting infrastructure, and opened applications for a committee to evaluate potential regulations. · source

Find the paper trail

Find the paper trail (0 filed · 11 places to look)

State environmental permits

Backup generators, water withdrawal and stormwater are permitted by the state, usually earlier and in more detail than anything filed locally.

County & town filings

The rezoning application, site plan, traffic and noise studies, staff report and every revision.

Utility & grid records

The electricity request is filed with the grid operator and the utility long before the town hears about it — and states the real load.

Federal databases

Works anywhere, and covers the operator's record at its other sites.

  • EPA ECHO facility searchEvery federally-reported air, water and waste permit at a facility, plus its inspection and violation history. Search by address or draw a radius around the site. This project's locality centres on 34.060, -106.890 — search that point with a 5-mile radius.
  • EPA EnvirofactsThe same underlying records, queryable by county — useful for 'what else is permitted near this site' rather than one facility.
  • EPA Facility Registry ServiceResolves the shell LLC on a permit to the facility it belongs to. Worth a look when the filing name means nothing locally.

These are places to look, not evidence that anything has been filed. Links were checked on 2026-08-21; search links are queries, not records. What to ask for.

Around here

Other tracked projects in New Mexico

Cite this page: GridWatch AI, “Green Data Socorro campus (New Mexico Tech land)”, aigridwatch.com/projects/socorro-green-data-nm-tech, retrieved 2026-10-11.

As of August 2026 (2m ago) · changes weekly — re-check before citing

A working set of identified proposals a community can track, not a census — most of the country's activity is not in here yet. Pennsylvania is the exception: its rows are synced from PA DEP's own data-center permit tracker, so the state's coverage is close to complete and carries the permit trail with it. **Each row carries its own provenance.** Rows showing a verification date link to reporting or the governing body's own record and were read on that date; rows marked *unverified* have no source on record — a lead to check, not a fact to cite. **Stage is derived, not asserted.** *Hearing scheduled*, *Awaiting decision*, *Approved* and *Withdrawn* are computed from each row's milestone dates on every rebuild, so a hearing date that has passed stops reading 'scheduled'. Hearings get moved and projects re-file under new names — treat a scheduled date as the earliest to act by, and confirm with the clerk before relying on it. Leads are mined into data/project_candidates.json and promoted here only after a human reads a primary source.

Part of the data center project tracker — open data, CC BY 4.0 (JSON · CSV).

Toolkit States Tracker Search