Project dossier · Fort Stockton (Pecos County), Texas

Amazon Fort Stockton campus Under construction

Amazon Data Services filed TDLR registrations for three data center buildings (A, B, C; 189,060 sq ft and ~$300 million each) at a site 11 miles north of Fort Stockton, with construction scheduled August-December 2026, part of an August 2026 filing wave totaling 16 buildings and at least $4.8 billion across Fort Stockton, Floydada, and Amazon's existing Boling (Wharton County) campus. Amazon confirmed it is financing the GW Ranch gas plant being developed by Pacifico Energy in Pecos County (35 turbines, 7.65 GW) to power the campus; its permitted emissions of over 30 million metric tonnes of GHG per year would exceed any single source currently operating in the US.

Key facts

Operator
Amazon Web Services
Owner
Amazon
Filing LLC
Amazon Data Services
Location
Fort Stockton (Pecos County), Texas
Stage today
Under construction

Source
read 2026-09-22

What to do next

Next step: Under construction — pull the approved conditions and permits and hold the builder to them; an expansion or a new building reopens the record.

Build an action pack for this project →

What has happened so far (15 events)

  • 2025-08-20announcement
    Pacifico Energy announced the GW Ranch project, an off-grid power generation campus on 8,000+ acres in Pecos County combining natural gas turbines and battery storage to deliver 5 GW for hyperscale data centers, with 1 GW targeted for 2028 and full capacity by 2030. · source
  • 2026-01-26permit
    Pacifico Energy announced it secured a TCEQ air permit for 7.65 GW of gas-fired power generation at GW Ranch, described as the largest air permit granted in the United States, with Phase 1 to deliver 1 GW in the first half of 2027. · source
  • 2026-02-04coverage
    The Big Bend Sentinel reported a massive AI data center campus coming to Pecos County on Highway 18 north of Fort Stockton, with Pecos County Judge Joe Shuster and Economic Development Director Remie Ramos expressing support for the project's economic benefits. · source
  • 2026-06-22hearing
    Pecos County Commissioners Court held a public hearing to designate and establish the GW Ranch Reinvestment Zone under Texas Tax Code Chapter 312 and considered approving a tax abatement agreement with Pacifico GW LLC. · source
  • 2026-07-24construction
    Airbus satellite imagery captured on this date showed land clearing already underway at the GW Ranch site north of Fort Stockton, as reported by Cleanview on August 7. · source
  • 2026-08-03announcement
    Governor Greg Abbott announced a moratorium on new data center approvals pending an ERCOT and PUCT audit of energy, water, and community impacts; off-grid projects like Amazon's Pecos County campus were noted as largely unaffected since they bypass grid interconnection. · source
  • 2026-08-06coverage
    RFD-TV reported that Floyd County commissioners plan to use a Chapter 312 tax abatement agreement to impose conditions on a proposed Amazon data center campus valued at over $1 billion in Floydada, part of the same August 2026 Amazon filing wave that includes the Fort Stockton campus. · source
  • 2026-08-07filing
    Amazon Data Services' TDLR filings for three 189,060 sq ft, ~$300M data center buildings 11 miles north of Fort Stockton were reported, with construction scheduled August-December 2026. · source
  • 2026-08-07coverage
    The New Republic reported that Amazon's GW Ranch gas plant in Pecos County, permitted for 33 million tons of CO2 annually, would be the biggest single pollution source in the United States, exceeding the nation's largest coal power plant. · source
  • 2026-08-08announcement
    Amazon confirmed it is financing the 7.65 GW, 35-turbine GW Ranch gas plant (developer Pacifico Energy) in Pecos County to power its new data center campus there, per reporting on Cleanview's analysis connecting Amazon's construction permits to the plant. · source
  • 2026-08-10coverage
    The San Antonio Current reported the Amazon campus on 8,400 acres along Highway 18, approximately 17 miles north of Fort Stockton, could become the nation's largest polluter, noting concerns about proximity to Big Bend National Park and Amazon's net-zero 2040 pledge. · source
  • 2026-08-11coverage
    E&E News by Politico reported on Amazon's off-grid gas plant in Pecos County, quoting Environment Texas executive director Luke Metzger warning that data centers will 'build gas plants and increase climate and local air pollution' rather than using cleaner grid electricity. · source
  • 2026-08-13coverage
    The Fort Stockton Pioneer published a report on community debate over the data center proposal's impact on Fort Stockton land, water, and future growth. · source
  • 2026-09-18coverage
    Marfa Public Radio reported that Pacifico Energy, the developer of the GW Ranch plant powering this campus, pitched Brewster County officials on a second off-grid data center and gas plant on about 8,400 acres in the Glass Mountains of Brewster County, estimated at $5 billion to $60 billion. County Judge Greg Henington said the county was 'not taking this, like a lay down'; about 10 residents spoke against it, citing air quality, noise and dark skies. · source
  • 2026-09-22coverage
    During Climate Week NYC, Democracy Now! broadcast from outside Amazon's New York office with Bill McKibben (350.org, Third Act) and Kavita Sthanumurthy of Amazon Employees for Climate Justice, who targeted the 35-turbine Pecos County gas plant. Sthanumurthy said the group's own research put Amazon's actual renewable share 'closer to 22%', against the company's 100% renewable claim; that figure is the group's, not an audited number. · source

Find the paper trail

Find the paper trail (1 filed · 11 places to look)

Permits already on file (1)

Filings we have a source for — the record, not a place to look for one.

  • 2026-01-26
    Pacifico Energy announced it secured a TCEQ air permit for 7.65 GW of gas-fired power generation at GW Ranch, described as the largest air permit granted in the United States, with Phase 1 to deliver 1 GW in the first half of 2027. · source

State environmental permits

Backup generators, water withdrawal and stormwater are permitted by the state, usually earlier and in more detail than anything filed locally.

County & town filings

The rezoning application, site plan, traffic and noise studies, staff report and every revision.

Utility & grid records

The electricity request is filed with the grid operator and the utility long before the town hears about it — and states the real load.

Federal databases

Works anywhere, and covers the operator's record at its other sites.

  • EPA ECHO facility searchEvery federally-reported air, water and waste permit at a facility, plus its inspection and violation history. Search by address or draw a radius around the site. This project's locality centres on 30.890, -102.880 — search that point with a 5-mile radius.
  • EPA EnvirofactsThe same underlying records, queryable by county — useful for 'what else is permitted near this site' rather than one facility.
  • EPA Facility Registry ServiceResolves the shell LLC on a permit to the facility it belongs to. Worth a look when the filing name means nothing locally.

These are places to look, not evidence that anything has been filed. Links were checked on 2026-08-21; search links are queries, not records. What to ask for.

Around here

Other tracked projects in Texas

Cite this page: GridWatch AI, “Amazon Fort Stockton campus”, aigridwatch.com/projects/amazon-fort-stockton-pecos, retrieved 2026-10-11.

As of August 2026 (2m ago) · changes weekly — re-check before citing

A working set of identified proposals a community can track, not a census — most of the country's activity is not in here yet. Pennsylvania is the exception: its rows are synced from PA DEP's own data-center permit tracker, so the state's coverage is close to complete and carries the permit trail with it. **Each row carries its own provenance.** Rows showing a verification date link to reporting or the governing body's own record and were read on that date; rows marked *unverified* have no source on record — a lead to check, not a fact to cite. **Stage is derived, not asserted.** *Hearing scheduled*, *Awaiting decision*, *Approved* and *Withdrawn* are computed from each row's milestone dates on every rebuild, so a hearing date that has passed stops reading 'scheduled'. Hearings get moved and projects re-file under new names — treat a scheduled date as the earliest to act by, and confirm with the clerk before relying on it. Leads are mined into data/project_candidates.json and promoted here only after a human reads a primary source.

Part of the data center project tracker — open data, CC BY 4.0 (JSON · CSV).

Toolkit States Tracker Search