Project dossier · Shackelford County, Texas

OpenAI Stargate Shackelford Under construction

Part of Stargate.

Key facts

Operator
Oracle
Owner
Oracle
Tenant
OpenAI
Location
Shackelford County, Texas
Stage today
Under construction

Source
read 2026-08-14

What to do next

Next step: Under construction — pull the approved conditions and permits and hold the builder to them; an expansion or a new building reopens the record.

Build an action pack for this project →

What has happened so far (9 events)

  • 2025-07-21vote
    Shackelford County Commission unanimously approved Vantage Data Centers' 1,200-acre data center project, including a 10-year tax abatement with $10 million in annual payments to the county. · source
  • 2025-08-01coverage
    KTXS reported the Vantage data center is expected to create 250 full-time permanent jobs and employ up to 6,500 workers during peak construction, with construction starting later in 2025 and completion targeted for 2029. · source
  • 2025-08-19announcement
    Vantage Data Centers formally announced its $25 billion Frontier campus in Shackelford County: 1.4 GW of capacity across 10 data centers on 1,200 acres totaling 3.7 million square feet, with over 5,000 jobs expected across construction and operations. · source
  • 2025-08-21coverage
    CarbonCredits.com reported on water concerns around the Frontier campus, noting Texas Water Development Board forecasts that data centers could account for about 7 percent of Texas' total projected water use by 2030; Vantage had not disclosed specific water consumption projections for the site. · source
  • 2025-12-16construction
    Vantage Data Centers broke ground on the Frontier campus, confirmed as part of OpenAI and Oracle's Stargate initiative; the first facility was scheduled for Q2 2026 with full campus completion targeted for 2028. · source
  • 2026-07-17hearing
    County Judge John M. Viertel held an informal open session with residents to discuss reinvestment zones after a second data center proposal was introduced at a commissioners court meeting; residents questioned whether another data center was necessary. · source
  • 2026-07-22protest
    County Judge John Viertel acknowledged community backlash against the second proposed data center, stating 'the overall view is resistance' and that residents prioritize cultural preservation over economic benefits; water supply was cited as the most prominent concern. · source
  • 2026-08-13hearing
    A town hall was held at Albany High School for community input on a second data center proposed by Bolt Data and Energy at Buck Nail Ranch, about 16 miles west of Albany; the company had not disclosed the project's size, water demand, or job count, and commissioners had not approved the project. · source
  • 2026-08-14coverage
    KTXS reported mixed community reactions to the second proposed data center; resident Blaine Kayga said 'there's just way more negatives than there are positives,' citing traffic and safety issues from existing data center construction, while others noted potential employment benefits. · source

Find the paper trail

Find the paper trail (0 filed · 11 places to look)

State environmental permits

Backup generators, water withdrawal and stormwater are permitted by the state, usually earlier and in more detail than anything filed locally.

County & town filings

The rezoning application, site plan, traffic and noise studies, staff report and every revision.

Utility & grid records

The electricity request is filed with the grid operator and the utility long before the town hears about it — and states the real load.

Federal databases

Works anywhere, and covers the operator's record at its other sites.

  • EPA ECHO facility searchEvery federally-reported air, water and waste permit at a facility, plus its inspection and violation history. Search by address or draw a radius around the site. This project's locality centres on 32.380, -99.770 — search that point with a 5-mile radius.
  • EPA EnvirofactsThe same underlying records, queryable by county — useful for 'what else is permitted near this site' rather than one facility.
  • EPA Facility Registry ServiceResolves the shell LLC on a permit to the facility it belongs to. Worth a look when the filing name means nothing locally.

These are places to look, not evidence that anything has been filed. Links were checked on 2026-08-21; search links are queries, not records. What to ask for.

Recent news

Automated news aggregation, not human-verified — follow each link to the original outlet. Part of the story tracker, 1 headline archived.

Around here

Other tracked projects in Texas

Cite this page: GridWatch AI, “OpenAI Stargate Shackelford”, aigridwatch.com/projects/openai-stargate-shackelford, retrieved 2026-10-11.

As of August 2026 (2m ago) · changes weekly — re-check before citing

A working set of identified proposals a community can track, not a census — most of the country's activity is not in here yet. Pennsylvania is the exception: its rows are synced from PA DEP's own data-center permit tracker, so the state's coverage is close to complete and carries the permit trail with it. **Each row carries its own provenance.** Rows showing a verification date link to reporting or the governing body's own record and were read on that date; rows marked *unverified* have no source on record — a lead to check, not a fact to cite. **Stage is derived, not asserted.** *Hearing scheduled*, *Awaiting decision*, *Approved* and *Withdrawn* are computed from each row's milestone dates on every rebuild, so a hearing date that has passed stops reading 'scheduled'. Hearings get moved and projects re-file under new names — treat a scheduled date as the earliest to act by, and confirm with the clerk before relying on it. Leads are mined into data/project_candidates.json and promoted here only after a human reads a primary source.

Part of the data center project tracker — open data, CC BY 4.0 (JSON · CSV).

Toolkit States Tracker Search